While these utes are getting greater, heavier and more tech-loaded nowadays, there is a positive pattern towards littler limit, high-yield diesel motors that track the center ground of low effectiveness and emanations, while pushing out a lot of torque because of cutting edge infusion and turbocharging innovation. Practically all fair sized utes have a motor limit underneath three liters nowadays. The main special cases are Isuzu's understressed, low-yield 4JJI 3.0-liter four-chamber motor, and the V6 drivelines offered by Mercedes and Volkswagen.
The two utes originate from German brands, however just a solitary one is worked in the country (Mercedes is Spain, and this specific spec of the Amarok is created in Hannover). They both have a solitary turbo, 3.0-liter V6 that makes a lot of intensity and torque. They both have a full-time 4WD driveline, programmed transmission and locking back differential. They're additionally both accessible at high pricepoints, with correspondingly extensive arrangements of incorporations.
What we have in this correlation is the recently stamped Mercedes-Benz X350d in Dynamic detail. We've squandered no time in arranging it against its immediate rival, Volkswagen7's Amarok V6 Extreme 580.
With a rundown cost of $73,270, the X350d Dynamic sits underneath the $79,415 Power demonstrate. In light of the Navara (yet modified a considerable amount), the X-Class X350dgets a Mercedes-determined drivetrain rather than the Nissan-sourced four-chamber diesel utilized let down the value go.
The Amarok we have here is the highest point of the tree for Volkswagen's ute, with a sticker cost of $72,790. In this spec, it claims extreme gloating privileges of having the brawniest donk this side of something greater, changed or oil fueled – 190kW comes through between 3250– 4500rpm, while 580Nm of torque is accessible from 1400– 3000rpm. The Amarok likewise has an 'overboost' work that stimulates an additional 10kW from the engine for brief periods, at the correct velocities (over 50km/h) and in the correct apparatus (fourth or fifth rigging).
The Mercedes, in correlation, has just slight contrasts on paper – 190kW winds up accessible at 3400rpm, while 550Nm goes ahead tap between 1400– 3200rpm. Along these lines, there is a similar power, accessible without a rev run, while 30Nm less is accessible with a somewhat more extensive band of revs.
The Amarok utilizes an eight-speed ZF gearbox behind the V6, which controls every one of the four wheels without an exchange case. The 'Benz is full-time 4WD also, utilizing Mercedes' very own 7G-Tronic seven-speed programmed gearbox in addition to two-speed exchange case. Another unpretentious distinction is the inside differential: the X-Class has a locking focus diff, while the Amarok utilizes a Torsen unit.
In spite of the fact that we haven't tried the cases, Volkswagen's 7.3sec 0– 100km/h figure gives it a slight edge over the 7.5sec X-Class. Fuel utilization between the two utes is fundamentally the same as. Mercedes records 8.8 liters per hundred kilometers, while the Amarok has a 8.9L/100km figure recorded.
A brisk look under the cap of every vehicle lets you know all that you have to know: there is valuable no place for whatever else under there, and the X-Class loses common sense focuses for the area of the air channel covered where it counts beside the motor sound.
You're not going to dismantle it out to check it regularly, and you'll likely be paying a motza to get it changed come administration time.
Mercedes' X-Class is somewhat more (5340mm v 5254mm), with a more extended wheelbase (3150mm v 3095mm). The Amarok, be that as it may, is just marginally taller (1834mm v 1819mm) and more extensive (1954mm v 1920mm). Neither one of the vehicles is light, with 2285kg and 2244kg being the recorded kerb loads, the X-Class being marginally chubbier.
No comments:
Post a Comment